⚠️ This is a news story and may not be up to date. You can find the date it was published under the title. Our Tax Guides feature the latest up-to-date tax information and guidance.
Press Release: A role for online platforms in enforcing tax compliance?
Campaigners for taxpayers on low incomes have given a cautious welcome to a call for evidence launched today on ways in which online platforms could act as intermediaries between their users and HMRC by enabling users to understand and comply with their tax obligations.
Anne Fairpo, Chair of the Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), said:
“LITRG welcomes anything that can help workers navigate their tax affairs easily and accurately, but it is often unclear whether a worker in a particular situation is self-employed or employed and resolving that question is a prerequisite in determining how they should be taxed. Also, HMRC should not forget the necessity of enforcing tax compliance among the engagers of labour.
“Online platforms have many uses, and their role in matching engagers with providers of labour has recently come under scrutiny in the Matthew Taylor report Good work. In addition, a series of court decisions have explored the true status of gig economy workers, and often found that it is at odds with how the workers are labelled by the engagers of their labour.
“Anything that makes it easier for gig economy workers to determine their true status and pay tax and NICs accordingly – and for the engagers of their labour to pay employers’ NICs wherever appropriate – is to be welcomed. It must be acknowledged that the primary responsibility for helping workers get their tax right rests with the authorities, given the confusion around status and the general lack of financial capability within much of the population.
“One solution might be to enable platforms to operate something akin to the construction industry tax deduction scheme, but at a rate that would minimise the number of situations in which workers have to claim refunds of over-deducted tax. Final adjustments could be made by means of a simple reconciliation process at the end of the year.
“And of course where the engager of an individual’s labour falsely describes the nature of the engagement (for example representing that the worker is self-employed when in reality he or she is employed), the blame for non-compliance should be placed squarely upon the engager. In such cases it is up to the tax authority to enforce the law without involving the worker who is often an innocent participant in an attempt by the engager to avoid tax and NIC obligations.
“If online platforms can have a role in helping HMRC in its task of enforcement, the engager in its duty to apply the correct status, and the worker to pay the right tax at the right time, some headway will be made towards solving what now seems an intractable problem.”