Skip to main content
Government building with a British flag
Updated on 15 August 2018

Off-payroll working in the private sector

The LITRG appreciate that the Government have considerable concerns regarding the non-compliance of the rules commonly known as IR35 in the private sector. We share these concerns and want people to pay the right amount of tax; however, we think the Government should proceed cautiously with ...

Retirement-outcomes-review-FCA-LITRG-response
Updated on 7 August 2018

Retirement Outcomes Review: Proposed changes to FCA rules and guidance

LITRG has responded to a wide-ranging consultation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on the options now available to all those converting their pension pots into alternative forms of income or capital. The FCA has serious concerns that many savers are simply re-investing their pots in cash ...

Tax-abuse-insolvency
Updated on 3 July 2018

Tax abuse and insolvency – a discussion document

In principle, we agree there is a problem with the insolvency regime being used to avoid or evade tax liabilities, including through the use of phoenixism. Indeed, the insolvency regime seems to be behind the somewhat cavalier behaviour we have seen from certain employment intermediaries such as ...

a clipboard with the word 'TRAINING' and lots of graphs
Updated on 14 June 2018

Taxation of self-funded work-related training

LITRG recently responded to HM Treasury’s consultation document exploring the possibility of extending tax relief for the cost of training by employees and the self-employed, in an attempt to encourage more individuals to develop and improve their skills or to retrain completely to help boost the ...

Treasury-sub-commitee-dispute-resolution-tax-enquiries
Updated on 13 June 2018

Inquiry into the conduct of tax enquiries and resolution of tax disputes

The LITRG raises concerns about the number of dispute cases reaching the Tribunal which ought never to have been escalated in the first place. We are hugely concerned about the position of unrepresented taxpayers aggrieved by decisions against which there is no right of appeal. There is a strong ...

Back to top